Subscribe

 

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Call Us: 678-561-0390

1. Why review podcasts?
2. How can I include a podcast for review?
3. What is the goal?
4. Are podcasts of different genres covered?
5. Why rate with 1 to 5 stars?
6. Are scores considered objective?
7. Are the written reviews the same as the material covered on the show?
8. How are podcasts chosen for review?
9. Why review three podcasts per week?
10. Does the show accept money from podcasters or networks?
11. Should podcasting be standardized?


1. Why review podcasts?

A. Simple. We are avid fans of the diversity of content that podcasts provide. We review podcasts to provide feedback in the areas of content and quality to those creating the podcasts and to guide audiences to podcasts that may interest them more than others.

2. How can I include a podcast for review?

A. Email us the address displayed on the site. Please include the following information.

1. Your name
2. Producer or fan.
3. Name of the podcast.
4. Web address the podcast is located.
5. Email address so we can notify you when the show is reviewed and to verify you are either a producer of the show or fan.

3. What is the primary goal for rating podcasts?

A. To promote podcasting. There are thousands of podcasts created internationally. Currently, the mainstream of audiences have no idea of the incredible content found in this new media industry.

4. Are podcasts of different genres covered?

A. Yes. All genres are welcomed to include their show for review.

5. Why rate with 1 to 5 stars?

A. It is the standard most used when rating or scoring.

6. Are scores considered objective?

A. Yes and No. The opinion of the hosts clearly are stated in the audio podcast and in the written reviews. However, we are the only podcasts or blog that has a stated criteria for rating podcasts. Hosts, Daniel and Jana, strictly adhere to rules provided from the posted criteria. This system provides accountability for the hosts and to other podcasts to prevent subjective opinion from dictating why shows are rated higher than others.

7. Are the written reviews the same as the material covered on the show?

A. The written reviews are used as a concise account for what is discussed on the show. It gives users options to consume the content in a manner they prefer. However, more content is covered and discussed on the podcast vs. written review.

8. How are podcasts chosen for review?

A. Most shows are submitted either by podcasters or fans of a specific show. The other podcasts are selected by how they represent the industry vs. shows that are submitted.

9. Why review three podcasts per week?

A. It allows us time to get to know the shows and hosts by listening to many episodes before we submit a final review.

10. Does the show accept money from podcasters or networks for a better score?

A. No.

11. Should podcasting be standardized?

A. Podcasts should only be standardized to the extent that proves beneficial for the podcasting community as a whole. Standards are beneficial when a show is measuring their audience and when it allows podcasts to be distributed in a more user-friendly fashion promotes audiences to find shows that will interest them. Currently, there is a not a one-size-fits-all model.

Share With Others:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Comments are closed.